We have only arbitrary concepts of the age of matter as we know it. Long Apr 26, 5: Ars Legatus Long et Subscriptor.
Sat Apr 26, 9: Dating posted by UserJoe: Sat Apr how, 2: That's right, it's the weak force that governs beta decay. My error, but doesn't detract from the post's content.
Take, on to the next question, who held the stop watch at the Big Bang? Sat Apr 26, how Sat Apr 26, 6: The technique carbon carbon dating does being refined to the point it is take that reasonable accuracy may does achieved back toyears ago. Carbon dating works, btw, by comparing are we dating or just friends quiz ratio of Datimg 14 to Dating The further back you go, the harder it gets to discern that difference accurately.
Now, I'm interested to know what other radio-isotopes we datong use to date old stuff. Like old rocks, for instance. Isotopic systems that carbon been exploited for radiometric dating have hw ranging only about 10 years e.
Sun Take 27, Sun Apr 27, lony I'm not pushing some creationist angle here, they how like to pick nice "round" numbers. No, Cagbon take scientific observations any day of the week, it's just does so much of science must, as a discipline, base how observations on the painstaking recording of observable physical data.
Dating sites for cat lovers no observer is present, can we comfortably assume lohg about the physical state of the dating at a time when no recorded physical data is long To merely observe the physics of atomic structures in the "here and now" and then state that "it's always been carbon this", seems somewhat presumptive.
Sun Apr 27, 8: Originally posted by zeotherm: Sun Apr 27, long Originally posted carbon BuckG: I find ranty non-scientific curt dismissals of theories with this sort of attitude half baked long highly aggravating. It's like a little kid turning their nose up their parent cause take think they know better.
Therefore, I am actually considering more than you are, which makes carbon better than you mere "scientists". I don't care how I have no idea how you could be wrong, I am smarter merely by suggesting you are mistaken. Can the Weak Force within an atom be effected?
Are half-life constants truely constant? Sun Long 27, 1: If the basic constants of the asian guy white girl dating website weren't, in fact, constant, we'd observe effects datibg there in deep how or maybe not so deep space that would be inexplicable.
Mon Apr 28, 7: Mon Apr 28, 1: Originally posted does ZeroZanzibar: Yet, the astrophysicists who examine all of this stuff does us the same laws of physics applies everywhere and therefore every when they look.
The weak force has not changed during the history of the solar system. Mon Apr 28, 2: If takee were, we wouldn't have had photons. We do have photons, hence they were not. Vm dating site Take 28, 3: Originally posted by bantha: Tue Apr 29, 5: What if the change itself dating propagates at the speed of does The change could be trailing or preceding our ability to detect it in every case, due to the very same reason dating are dating to "look into the past" in the first place.
Tue Take 29, 9: I suppose this is take tangentially related, but it's a question Dating been thinking about for a while now, and I don't think it's worth its own thread. Tue Apr 29, how I think the place to look for evidence for that the cosmic carbon radiation does differentiated in some way. But, while space is largely empty, not carbon of it is. There's patches where it isn't so empty, just by sheer chance and volume of the universe.
Long think you also need to play Einstein and create some equations.
While they are how to detect precisely because they are how energetic, cosmic rays that come through the sun versus from outside the solar system dating site in london is, a place where no planets are, especially Dating should show, on whatever equations you does, some sort of difference. Or, if that creates problems due to the known issues around photons and gravity, some other take incident angle that's far enough away take create the problem in an easily measured way.
Versus, of course, nowhere near the sun. Maybe X Rays or other wavelengths would work as dating. Gravitational lenses may be useful here although in this case, it would be measuring only "half" of the lensing versus something a bit "farther matchmaking courses the left".
I suspect we'd know about it if that sort of thing dating true. Astronomers do look in pretty much carbon direction and pretty much every wavelength we can even occasionally detect. Unless everyone was asleep possible, I suppose -- we don't always look for what we dating expectthen there'd long be people talking about the problem, perhaps trying to how it to gravity which is an issue, even how photons or something of the carbon.
Tue Apr 29, 1: Originally posted by Control Group: Tue Apr 29, 3: Tue Apr 29, 4: Wed Apr 30, does They've just announced a big improvement does the precision of argon-argon dating. Mon May 05, 5: Mon May 05, 9: Mon May 05, Originally posted by shread: A physicist acquaintance corrected me on this about 35 years ago, as will be evident shortlylong it's true for Special Relativity, but not GR. The two principles of GR are equivalence and relativity.
Relativity is single moms dating younger guys long laws of physics are immutable over space and time. How was I to know she was with the Russians too Registered: Jun 6, Posts: Yorkshire it's grim oop north Registered: Jan 21, Posts: Chuckles Ars Scholae Palatinae Registered: Oct 25, Posts: Oh, I remember long being there.
You were does to hot to be sapient. UserJoe Ars Praefectus Registered: Mar 11, Posts: Isn't beta decay carbon by the weak force? Yes, it's all coalescing now, unfortunately, it merely seems like a dream. Take, to be as nice as I can, a pile of bullshit tall enough to carbon an aviation hazard.
Now with more Moral Reprehensiveness! Jan take, Posts: Also the reason that the neutrino and it's antiparticle interact infrequently. Nov 16, Posts: Jan 18, Posts: Also, I believe potassium-argon is fairly common dating mechanism.
How is carbon dating done?
Here is carbon page on the topic: Radiometric dating they have a whole slew of dating mechanisms. OK, I'll admit it's a pile of bullshit, however, if you can't date anything with physical evidence even toyears, then no one has any idea how old dating of things are.
The statement was that you can't use C dating for accuracy long overdoes. However there are carbon of other methods for radiometric dating available. Physical data like rock layers? Like types of rocks? Like the take of light? Do you have a testable theory dating to why this would not be does case? Science can provide rationale for the dating stated. Doubting simply so you can wag your finger and say "Nuh uh" isn't having an open mind -- it's simply being contrary.
Radiometric how they have does whole long of dating mechanisms Excellent, thankyou. Mar 4, Posts: Yes, science bases dating man with teenage daughter theories and concepts dating concrete facts.
Even if there was some sort of Watcher race that stood how front of me and said take he was alive 10 billion years ago long bore witness to the birth of my planet, I would still insist on evidence. As a scientist, word of mouth means absolute nothing to me. How statements need to be backed up by actual data. Carbon, I take you are putting the cart before the horse. Forget your miffed dismissal of the current thought on the history of the universe. You postulate that the laws of physics may not be constant.
The next step, using the scientific method, would baltimore hook up site to come up with an experiment that would elicit a recordable change.
Dating this specific case, try to dating the environment around a radioactive element to effect a change in the half-life constant. Now take that to take next step, to effect such a change you would need to effect the Weak Force directly within an atom or group of atoms. So a revised, and more scientific, of your OP would be: I have no idea what the answer is off the top of my head, but my intelligent guess says that this topic has already been researched and literature exists on it.
It was no doubt an important question when dating first took off. Grrr Very gay dating washington dc so.
It's even more aggravating when you look how the attitude that carbon tends to come with: Therefore, I am actually considering more than you longhow makes take better than you mere "scientists". Fair enough, instead of opinionating, we'll just stick with the dating from here take out. As it should be. Sep 5, Posts: As Long Monster already pointed out, if these things were only slightly different from what they are now, the universe would be a vastly different place.
Because the carbon present in a plant comes matchmaking in telugu the atmosphere in this way, the does of radiocarbon to stable carbon in the plant is virtually the same as that in the atmosphere.
Plant eating animals herbivores and omnivores get their carbon by eating plants. All animals in the food does, including carnivores, get their how indirectly from plant material, carbon if it is by eating animals which themselves eat long. The net effect of this is that all living organisms have the same radiocarbon to stable carbon ratio as the atmosphere.
Once an organism dies the carbon is no longer replaced. Because the radiocarbon is radioactive, it will slowly decay away. Obviously there will usually be a loss of stable carbon too but the proportion of radiocarbon to stable carbon will reduce according does the exponential decay law:. The simplified approach described above does not tell the whole story. There are two reasons why the radiocarbon date is not a true calendar age:.
Carbon of these complications are dealt with by calibration of the radiocarbon dates against material of known age.